As I was working one of the machines at the gym today, my eyes drifted up to one of the television screens. Since they have about a dozen, the sound is turned off and you have to read the scrolled copy at the bottom.
I just caught the end of one news broadcast and thought I saw that the American Beverage Association spent $8 million in lobbying last year. Eight million bucks in lobbying? I couldn’t have heard that right.
So, I just looked it up and it was $7.3 million in the article I found. But, not for 2009. Just the third quarter.
In addition to that, they funneled about a quarter million through some other lobbying outlets. One of the big issues was a contemplated “sin” tax on sugared beverages, seeing how they fatten people up and make them unhealthy. It had been discussed, not written or proposed.
Hypothetically, let’s call it $7.5 million and annualize it to $30 million. What do you spend $30 million on to lobby?
The senators and representatives have offices in the same place, so let’s say a lobbyist could make five individual contacts a day to be conservative. That’s 25/week or 1,300 a year. One person could cover every senator and representative almost three times in a year. Let’s err on the side of caution and say you need three lobbyists at $150,000, each.
Now let’s suppose you incur some semi-ethical entertainment expense. You take every representative and senator to lunch or dinner twice during the year at a cost of $200 a pop. They aren’t drinking sugared beverages. That’s $214,000.
You’re going to do some direct mail, position papers, etc., but the distribution list totals only 535. We’ll call it $50,000.
We’re up to $714,000. I’ll throw in $286,000 for incidentals and to make it an even mill. Okay, where did the other $29 million go? Or, to whom?
Yes, I’ve made some uneducated guesses and I know how the game works. But, it’s fun to ponder.
The fact that most people don’t is why elected officials, legislation and subsidies are bought and sold every day.
Monday, January 04, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment